Chuyển đến nội dung chính

Visitors (statistics)

Status for review manuscript submission to journal

Status for review manuscript submission to journal

This post can be found at http://www.somanyinsects.org/blog/june-22nd-2012





My experience with 'Manuscript Central' has been somewhat frustrating. It is an online system for manuscript management. Many journals are now using this system for authors to submit their manuscripts, for editors to handle them and for reviewers to review manuscripts. It is generally easy to use. However, my recent experience has told me otherwise. 
I submitted a manuscript to a journal in the field of evolutionary biology on May 12. I was able to choose an Associate Editor, who would decide if the manuscript will be reviewed and also invite reviewers. Immediately following the submission, the status appeared as 'awaiting AE assignment'. About a week later, the status  changed to 'awaiting reviewer selection'. I thought the Associate Editor must have done something to the manuscript. However, the status description contains some ambiguity - has it already gone out for review or is it still waiting to be assigned to reviewers? I waited for about a month, but nothing happened. It was still showing the same status 'awaiting reviewer selection'. On June 15, I wrote an email to the managing editor of the journal to inquire on the status of the manuscript. The managing editor was quite responsive. She passed the question on to the handling editor, who wrote an email to the Associate Editor who was supposed to handle the manuscript. About two days later, I got an email back from the managing editor, which said the Associate Editor had been unresponsive and another Associate Editor had to be assigned to process the manuscript. On Jun 19, the status of the manuscript changed to 'awaiting reviewer assignment', and it is now 'awaiting reviewer scores'. I assume the latter means reviewers already accepted to invitations to do the review. 



After submission completed



After 1 week
To sum up, I have seen at least four status update categories used in 'Manuscript Central' and my interpretations of their meanings are:
  1. Awaiting AE assignment - Manuscript has not been looked at by the Associate Editor chosen.
  1. Awaiting Reviewer Selection - Manuscript already gone to the Associate Editor and he/she is in the process to select reviewers
  1. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - The Associate Editor has assigned the manuscript or sent invitations to reviewers. Waiting for the reviewers to accept the invitation for review. 

Updated: Nov 23, 2017

Awaiting Reviewer Scores - Reviewers have accepted invitations and started reviewing. Depending on the journal, this period can take variable amount of time. It is commonly is one-month, wit some journals requiring a even shorter time.

Awaiting Reviewer Reply

Update: 1/1/2018

There should also be a 5th category for post-review decision. 
I can't be sure about the accuracy of my interpretations. There would be more status updates as the manuscript reviewing process proceeds. I just hope that the 'Manuscript Central' system can provide some description of the status updates so that authors know exactly what is going on with their manuscripts. 
The following is added based on comment by 
Navneet on 03/25/2014. It is not clear what journal is.Awaiting admin checklist Þ Administrator checks if the paper contains all necessary parts and is suitable for a review.
Awaiting AE assignement 
Þ Editor-in-chief (EIC) chooses the associate editor (AE) responsible for the review process.
Awaiting reviewer selection 
Þ AE invites at least two reviewers.
Awaiting reviewer assignment 
Þ Reviewers decide if they accept or decline the invitation (in the second case AE invites another reviewer).
Awaiting reviewer scores 
Þ Reviewers are working on their reviews.


Awaiting AE recommendation 
Þ The paper received the sufficient number of reviews (usually 2) and, on their basis, AE makes recommendation to EIC.
Awaiting EIC decision 
Þ Taking into account the reviewers´comments, AE recommendation and his own opinion, EIC makes a final decision about the paper (accept – revision – reject




Dear [Insert journal editor’s name]:
This is with regard to my/our submitted manuscript, [Insert manuscript reference number], titled “[Insert manuscript title],” submitted to your journal on [Insert date of submission] for consideration as a [Insert article type, e.g., Original Article or Case Report].
We have not received an update regarding the status of our manuscript in the review process. Could you let us know when we can expect notice regarding the decision of the editorial board?
Thank you for your time and consideration. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Nhận xét

Bài đăng phổ biến từ blog này

Phần mềm dinh dưỡng tính khẩu phần ăn - Hướng dẫn phần mềm Vietnam Eiyokun

bạn muốn biết bạn đã ăn bao nhiêu kcal protit, lipip, gluxit, bao nhiêu g vitamin và vô số chất dinh dưỡng khác trong bữa ăn hằng ngày? làm thế nào để tính được 1 người nặng 100 kg cao 1m80 mỗi ngày cần bao nhiêu protit, lipip, gluxit? 1 công việc quá đơn giản đối với 1 nhà dinh dưỡng chuyên nghiệp. vấn đề là chúng ta thường là các nhà dinh dưỡng không chuyên. nhưng với phần mềm Vietnam Eiyokun tất cả chúng ta đều trở thành những nhà bán chuyên nghiệp. các bạn download hướng dẫn tại đây Bản cài đặt tại đây . pass mở file là itcchue code là A020400312

Các phép tính đơn giản ứng dụng trong SPSS - Lệnh Compute

Xin nhắc lại đây là những bài viết ở mức độ hướng dẫn cơ bản và mang tính chất cá nhân nên không thể tránh sai sót. Chỉ là mang tính chất xây dựng nguồn tài liệu của YTCC Huế Chủ đề hôm nay là thực hiện các phép tính cơ bản: Đơn giản muốn tính BMI trong SPSS. Bạn làm thế nào, trong khi đã có dữ kiện là Cân nặng, chiều cao (cm). BMI = (Cân nặng/(Chiều cao* chiều cao)*10000) Mô tả bằng hình ảnh trong SPSS. H1:  H2 Bạn trở lại cửa sổ Variable View sẽ thấy 1 biến mới "BMI" xuất hiện. Nó là kết quả của việc thực hiện thuât toán trên. Xin lỗi là công thức trên thiếu 1 dấu ")" cuối cùng trong hình 2. Thks đã đọc TBT Ytcchue.blogspot.com

Recode – mã hoá lại biến trong Stata

Lệnh recode giúp ta mã hoá lại các giá trị của biến theo những điều kiện được đưa ra. Giá trị nào không phù hợp với biểu thức điều kiện sẽ không bị thay đổi, ngoại trừ phù hợp với những điều kiện kèm theo. Câu lệnh như sau: recode danh sách biến (biểu thức điều kiện) [biểu thức điều kiện] [if] [in] [, tuỳ chọn]